|
Home::Thomas Russell
Why Christian and Atheist Libertarians Get Along
Author : Kenn Gividen
I’m the most religious guy in the Libertarian Party. At least that’s what my friend, Charlie, decided. I don’t know if his bit of insight was meant to be a compliment or a mere observation. Either way, I suppose there are others more deserving. For his part, Charlie is a declared atheist. And, therein lays a dilemma for some libertarians. How can I — a certified, card-carrying Bible thumper — stand shoulder to shoulder with a guy who’s never thumped a Bible in his life? In spite of ourselves One may assume there is a détente in which the discussion of religion is avoided like a trip to the dentist. One would be wrong. I find few things more intellectually stimulating than a lively spat with a well-informed atheist — particularly when feeble attempts are made to defend the untenable; eg, evolution. Or, one may assume there is a level of irreconcilable toleration. Not so. Some of the best Christians I know are atheists. By that, I mean, atheists usually surpass Christians in areas such as morality, decency and human kindness. I don’t tolerate these people. I like them. I enjoy their company. I’d rather hang out with a crowd of honest atheists than a church full of back-stabbing Baptists any day of the week, including Sunday. So why do libertarian Christians and atheists get along? Exclusion doesn’t work The answer can be found in the word, “inclusion.” Think about it. When Protestants control a government – say Northern Ireland, for example – Catholics and other non-Protestants have a tough way to go. And when Catholics take charge – as in Ireland – Protestants find themselves on the outside looking in. Come to think of it, when any religious group takes control, all others face dire consequences. Consider the history of England. Bloody Mary had at least 275 Protestants burned at the stake (including the Archbishop of Canterbury) during her brief five-year term as Queen of England. A century later, Protestant Elizabeth I was executing Catholics. For their part, Muslims have a history of killing both Protestants and Catholics, not to mention Jews. Life, some think, would be simpler — if not safer — if no religious sect controlled government. Let’s put atheists in charge, they say. That would end sectarian bloodletting. The inherent problem with atheists at the helm of government can be seen by recounting life under the rule of French atheist Maximilien Robespierre. More than a century after Queen Elizabeth executed Catholics, and 200 years after Bloody Mary was being bloody, Robespierre was sending thousands to the guillotine. The atheistic government of Joseph Stalin killed millions and Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge slaughtered hundreds of thousands. Protestants, Catholics, Muslims and atheists have one thing in common: When any sectarian group controls government, people die. Yet that was the norm of world history until the 17th century. A place at the table Perhaps the most momentous day in American history was February 5, 1631 when a free-thinking British preacher named Roger Williams alit from a ship in Boston’s harbor.
Williams purchased land from the Indians and founded a community that became Rhode Island. Unlike the other colonies, Rhode Island separated civil and ecclesiastical governments. No sect would control government. Rather, all would have a place at the table. Williams’ philosophy of religious liberty was perceived to be an invitation to disaster. But the anticipated quarreling among the sects never materialized. In fact, the arrangement resulted in religious harmony. No religious institution felt threatened by any other, for all were free to believe (or not believe) as they pleased. There was no reason to burn your neighbors at the stake for having too many holes in their sleeves. And that takes us back to the original question. Why do Libertarians — Christians, atheists and other sectarians — manage to get along? The answer is simple. Like Williams, we understand the principle of inclusion. Everyone has a place at the table.
And so, I can relish the thought of being the most religious guy in the Libertarian Party without fear of Charlie sending me to the gulag. Erstwhile, my Christian friends will continue to call me the most libertarian guy in the Baptist church. ### Read Kenn's quotes at KennGividen.com Spam emails More free articles Related articles
|
More related feeds |
Why Christian and Atheist Libertarians Get Along Why do Libertarians Christians, atheists and other sectarians manage to get along? The answer is simple. Like Williams, we understand the principle of inclusion. Everyone has a place at the table. And so, I can relish the thought of ...Just Answers: Why Christian and Atheist Libertarians Get Along at ... more deserving. Top Adding: Why Christian and Atheist Libertarians Get Along at ... there are others more deserving. Tolerate Liberty The hunter speaks of the right to hunt, the clergyman of the freedom to worship God and the atheist of the freedom from state molestation in affairs of religion. But it is something else entirely to sing the praises of liberties for ... Back into the fray... You're not best friends, but you get along fine. You talk about sports - and if he's a Yankee fan and you're a Met fan you do some of that faux trash-talk that guys love to engage in with each other. But neither of you takes it that ... Why Christian and Atheist Libertarians Get Along Id rather hang out with a crowd of honest atheists than a church full of back-stabbing Baptists any day of the week, including Sunday. So why do libertarian Christians and atheists get along? Exclusion doesnt work The answer can be ... Shocking revelations about the fatosphere. No, really. You can be for fat acceptance and still any of the following: Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Conservative, Liberal, Male, Female, Asian, Black, Indian, White, Atheist, Buddhist, Christian, Muslim, Fat, Thin, Healthy, Unhealthy, ... How To Start Thinking All other things will follow, possibly even a broadening of reality, a bit of ‘channel deepening,’ and the possibility that we all get along, or at least pretend to long enough to allow people like myself to build our cabins in the ... Chapter 17 - Reviewing the evidence about the Bible You can do some research outside of the popular Christian circle, or even the popular atheist circle, come to educated conclusions about what it says, and continue to be an intellectually fulfilled believer. ... the current sorry state of modern unbelief Zindler signed on to debate whether evidence favored an atheist or Christian interpretation of things, but Zindler chose to claim that atheism makes no claims at all which seems implausible on its face. If atheism makes no claims, ...
|
|
|