ArticlesReader.com Menu
Newest Articles
Most Viewed Articles
ArticlesReader.com RSS
Submit Article
Login
Signup
Search the articles

Articles Main Categories
Advice
Animals
Automobiles
Business
Career
Communications
Computer Programming
Computers
Entertainment
Environment
Family
Fashion
Finance
Food
Health & Medical
Home & Garden
Humor
Internet Business
Internet Marketing
Legal
Leisure & Recreation
Marketing
Other
Politics
Reference & Education
Religion
Self Improvement
Sports
Technology & Science
Travel
Writing
Subscribe
Receive alert message from us when new articles submitted to our site for free.

Enter your name

Enter your email

Syndicate

















Related Products
Home::Tennis

Sorry Pete, But That's No Sacrifice

Author : Chris Lewis
Responding to criticism of being unemotional and boring, Pete Sampras was

once quoted as saying: "People have this perception of when I win majors that I don't look very ecstatic."



"By the same token, if you just look at what I have to give up and sacrifice in my daily life to compete at this level, it would be very weird if in my own way I wasn't feeling ecstatic about winning."



While not doubting for a second that ecstatic is how Pete feels when he wins a major, I do question what he has given up in order to become the best, possibly of all time, has been a sacrifice.



As with any athlete's career, the amount of time and effort a professional devotes to his sport is a matter of choice. Those choices are determined by the value the athlete attaches to being successful, to reaching the standards he has set for himself.



For instance, in the case of Sampras, it's been well documented that even as a young boy he held the dream of becoming a top tennis player. This, of course, is not unusual -- most sports begin with such dreams.



As a youngster, between the time switching from a two-handed to a one-handed backhand, Sampras would study videotapes of former Australian great, Rod Laver, hoping one day he would be good enough to emulate him.



Sampras established very early on in life exactly what he wanted for himself, and then proceeded to make choices in his daily life -- choices like watching videos of Laver -- that would take him closer to achieving his long-term goals.



He did so because he knew that that is what would make him happy; that the time spent investing in his future happiness would, he hoped, lead to the ecstasy he now experiences when he wins a major tennis event.



This is why I disagree with Pete when he says that such time has, in some way, involved sacrifice.



For instance, imagine if as a teenager, Pete had said to himself when deciding what to do with his day: "Yeah, I really would love to go to the movies with my friends. I think i'll forget about practising today, and shelve, for the moment, my dream of becoming a top tennis player, along with the happiness that will come with it. "After all, it'll be a whole lot of fun at the movies, and not going would be a real sacrifice.



But would it? Or would going to the movies with friends be the sacrifice?



What, to a person whose ambition is to become the best in the world, is more important -- going to a movie with friends, or spending time perfecting a shot on the practice court?



Because it is the answer to this question, and others like it, that determines whether or not a sacrifice is to be made.



It is questions like this that every serious athlete, not just Pete Sampras, faces every day. The questions amount to: time devoted to being the best I can be in my chosen career versus time devoted to other areas of my life that I condsider to be either less important or more important than my career.



Any time devoted to being the best, and not to other less important areas of life is NOT a sacrifice.



In the context of a serious athlete who is pursuing a dream in the face of competition from other equally ambitious, driven athletes, there is very little that compares, in the hierarchy of things, with the importance that such an athlete attaches to his or her career.



Which is why it is never a sacrifice for someone who is pursuing his career to choose to spend his time doing just that -- instead of other, far less important things.


Article Source: http://www.articledashboard.com





Copyright 2006 -- Chris Lewis is a former Number 1 ranked junior tennis player in the world (1975), and Wimbledon finalist (1983). During his playing career, his coaches were Harry Hopman and Tony Roche. You can read more of Chris's articles and tennis tips at his website, Expert Tennis Tips.





Spam emails More free articles

Related articles


  1. The Attacking player, how hard is it to be like Federer?
  2. Is Federer all Alone in his Style of Play? (Part II)
  3. Is Federer all Alone in his Style of Play? (Part I)
  4. Does faster mean better in Tennis? (Part II)
  5. Does faster mean better in Tennis? (Part I)
  6. Wimbledon Center Court
  7. Tennis Ethics
  8. Sorry Pete, But That's No Sacrifice
  9. Tennis Champions: Are They Born? Or Made?
  10. Tennis And "The Ugly Parent Syndrome"
  11. Tennis - Anticipation - Early Warning Systems, what is it?
More related feeds
Living With or Moving Out?
(I know this is a very modern translation...sorry for my KJV fans...but I like to put things in East Tennessee format). Now...over to 2 Peter 3 and 8: His divine power has "granted" us everything pertaining to life and godliness (ie the ...

25 new messages in 8 topics - digest
But he does not have to be a serving soldier to be a legal > >>>>> combatant. Being caught in combat does that for you. There's no > >>>>> case against this fellow in a remotely honest hearing. > > >>>>> Peter Skelton ...

'Solutions' series: Existentialism in a Human Life
No." he paused. "Well, I suppose it depends on how you look at it. Love itself can be a selfish thing. People tell you that love is selfless, that it's all about giving to the other person, but that's because making them happy makes you ...

The Unbetaed but completely edited TRSIADRAOT&O to Chapter 17.5
Matthew never gave up trying to gain her love so long as she did not outwardly and openly say no. From the top of the bell tower St. Peter waved at the boy, he turned and rang the bell to get his attention setting his pigeons off in a ...

18 new messages in 8 topics - digest
on the spot, no names, no questions asked. > > I wonder how many they'll get? Usually, a lot of old or jammy guns that have been sitting in someone's basement. Then, with the same money, you could prolly get a much better one. But thats ...

Fic - Ballykissangel - "Thunderbolts and Lightning" (2/3)
That's why it made no difference?" Either way, God 1 - Assumpta Fitzgerald 0, he thought to himself. Well played, the Man Upstairs. "Theologically," Peter agreed. "But there's more to it than that." "All right, let's approach this ...

childofiluvatar @ 2008-07-19T21:38:00
And I'm sorry, but if that's Disney's idea of 1940s British schoolchildren I think their research department is seriously lacking. On their arrival in Narnia they looked less a group of wartime evacuees and more a day out from the local ...

Fic: You've Got to Hide Your Love Away (11/16?)
“I'm sorry, Rose, but I said no,” he repeats firmly, shaking his head and turning away from her, back toward his office. It's obvious he thinks this conversation is over and done with, but she doesn't. And she's not about to let him ...

Can Business and Ministry Co-Exist
This argument does not rest upon weather or not we may buy and sell and be saved but rather upon weather being rich is sinful or not, and all the pseudo "my scriptures Trump yours and that's that." will no longer be allowed by God as an ...

The Dark Knight
Its primary value lies in what it's about, not how it's about it -- the style and formal approach of the film are good, but not outstanding, which is usually a prerequisite for greatness. But that's a quibble and I could certainly ...

 


 

2007 articlesreader.com - All Rights Reserved