ArticlesReader.com Menu
Newest Articles
Most Viewed Articles
ArticlesReader.com RSS
Submit Article
Login
Signup
Search the articles

Articles Main Categories
Advice
Animals
Automobiles
Business
Career
Communications
Computer Programming
Computers
Entertainment
Environment
Family
Fashion
Finance
Food
Health & Medical
Home & Garden
Humor
Internet Business
Internet Marketing
Legal
Leisure & Recreation
Marketing
Other
Politics
Reference & Education
Religion
Self Improvement
Sports
Technology & Science
Travel
Writing
Subscribe
Receive alert message from us when new articles submitted to our site for free.

Enter your name

Enter your email

Syndicate

















Related Products
Home::Technology & Science

Arguments for and against...

Author : Terry Dashner
Arguments for and against…

Terry Dashner……………..Faith Fellowship Church PO Box 1586 Broken Arrow, OK 74013

I’m going to lay it on the line for you. I’m going to tell you what they say regarding the existence of God. And then I’ll conclude my remarks by telling you what I say about the arguments. So here I go.

I begin with the ancient Greeks.

Aristotle gave us the most systematic expression of the reasons for believing in God. His philosophy, in turn, influenced the doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church and its greatest theologian—St. Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas, you might remember, gave us five proofs of God’s existence: Motion—things grow and develop by a hidden hand in nature (God); Causation—one thing causes another until you reach the first cause of all things which is God; Possibility and necessity—things exist in a network of relationships. Everything is dependent on something, except God. Gradation of being—the universe is a pyramid of beings at different levels of perfection. From worms to man to angels to God there is a continuum of creatures. And number five is Governance of the world—design in the universe speaks of a rational, caring, and orderly God.

Thomas’ A Posteriori Proofs (proving God’s existence by external things) stood solid throughout the Middle Ages and into the Reformation, but the 19th century turned things upside down. Philosophers like Hume and Kant tore into the argument of design with a vengeance. Kant affirmed that the most it could prove was that the universe had an architect. To convert the architect into God, a theologian would have to add the ontological argument. Later on scientists began attacking it. Scientists claimed that the design in the universe is appearance but not reality and make their appeal to Darwin or evolution. They concede that the hands and eyes of man are engineering marvels but emphatically claim that they are the products of millions of years of evolution.

But Darwinism isn’t every scientist’s rave. Evolution is refuted by the biologists who say that there isn’t enough time for evolution to take place by purely natural or chance factors within the two billion years that life is supposed to have existed on the earth. It takes greater faith then the theologian’s to believe that a bucket of dirt can evolve into a horse in a matter of ages. Then again the evolutionists counter: The giraffe must grow a long neck to reach the leaves he feeds on; the deer must develop long slender legs for running faster than his predator. These intra related connections speak of survival and adaptation of the fittest. But on the other hand, in cosmic teleology no such connections exist. Evolution fails again. There is no necessary connection between the distance of the earth from the sun and the amount of nitrogen on the surface of the earth. Again, to resort to probability or chance variation to produce these conditions calls for a greater miracle and a greater act of faith than believing in God (Bernard L. Ramm, A Christian Appeal to Reason, World Books Publishers 1972).

And then there is the A Priori Proofs (proving God’s existence by internal things—innate knowing that God exists). Some have said that God’s existence is an innate idea. Augustine and Calvin taught this. Augustine said that God is continuously putting pressure on man. Man’s sense of finitude is a way in which God impresses Himself upon man. But then again, the British philosopher John Locke (1632-1704), vigorously attacked the notion of man having any kind or innate, a priori knowledge (Essay Concerning Human Understanding, 1690). Time does not afford me the opportunity to list the other internal proofs of God’s existence. But take my word for it. For every one stated positively, there is also a thunderous refutation.

Now let me tell you what I think about this. I think we are missing the boat when we focus on proving the existence of God by human intellect alone. I think the argument should change directions. I think Professor Ramm states it well. He writes, “The whole weight of the Biblical view of God is in another direction. Scripture is not a record of how man finds God but how God finds man. The point of departure in Scripture is not how man infers or proves that God exists by either a logically organized proof or an unusual experience but that it is God who breaks into man and lets Himself be known” (Bernard L. Ramm, page 101). Hence, the key expression in Holy Scripture would not be proof of the existence of God but the true knowledge of God or the reality of God. The Bible doesn’t waste time trying to prove God’s existence through logic but declares His existence in the opening verse—“In the Beginning God…” From that point on the Scriptures demonstrate the Living God who invades human history and reveals Himself to man. God comes looking for man and not the other way around.

I don’t have to wrestle with proving God’s existence. I don’t understand many of the existential arguments anyway. Most of them give me a headache, trying to follow along. But here is the good news. God doesn’t expect me with my finite brain to understand His infinite ways. He comes searching for me. He gives me His own Spirit with which to hear His voice and respond by faith. God comes looking for me. God reveals Himself in the way He wants to be discovered. He initiates the process. I get to enjoy the relationship through Jesus Christ His Son.

It’s simply faith—that’s what God wants from me. He lives. His Life makes the difference. I don’t need a “philosophy” of religion when I can have a relationship in Jesus, the True Vine. How about you? Are you relating and abiding in the Vine?

Keep the faith. Stay the course. Jesus is coming soon.

Pastor T. dash…



About the Author

Pastors a small church.

Spam emails More free articles

Related articles


  1. Lighter Than Air Tubular Flight
  2. Tunneling Concepts for Advanced Warfare
  3. Laser Attack, EA, Scalar Attack on Composite Manufactured Vehicles
  4. How to Build a Mechanical Bullet Which Turns
  5. Shamans and Their Documented Abilities
  6. Weather Control and Creation to Use as a Screen for Troop Advancement
  7. Building a Single Unit CO2 Laser Grid
  8. Military Convoy Artificial Tubes for Safe Travel
  9. Organic Decoy Devices for Warfare (ODDW)
  10. Down Scrolling Text to Find Patterns
  11. Human Motion, Walking, Running and Gait for Identification
  12. Aluminum Oxide to Disrupt Laser Weapons
  13. Preventing Death in a Bio Threat
  14. Re-Designing the ICBM With The Latest and Greatest Technology
  15. Bio-Rhythm Disruption Frequency Identifier for Human Intentions
  16. 747 Onboard Laser Might Cause Mistake and Identity
  17. Active Aerial Minefields
  18. Free Energy from Space
  19. Micro Blimps Cleaning the Air in Buildings to Eliminate Anthrax spores
  20. Surround Panoramic Night Vision is Possible
  21. Confusing MAV Optic Flow Sensors In flight Using Mobiles
  22. MAV Propulsion and Testing
  23. UAV - Terrain Following Technologies
  24. MAVs, UAVs, and Insect Flight Characteristics
  25. Para Trooper Gliders With Angle of Attack Motor or Crank
More related feeds
Strong Arguments For and Against Sun's Role in Melanoma
Whether or not sun exposure is a major cause of melanoma is the subject of two opposing view Head to Head articles, published online July 22 in BMJ.

On Arguments Against Longevity
In conclusion: Most arguments against extreme life extension are based on the [preconceived] idea that it can never happen, or that it shouldn't happen. As science and technology advances, these arguments are waning. ...

Staycations: Arguments For and Against
Related posts. Staycations: Arguments For and Against (0); Staycations: Arguments For and Against (0); Staycations: Arguments For and Against (0); Sailing at the Highest Altitude - Gautama Dutta (0); A Cure for Jet Lag in Melbourne (0)

Your BEST arguments for/against the 9/11 towers
yeah, i know it's been beat to death, but somehow people still THINK 3 towers can collapse in a single day from fires when a tower has NEVER collapsed due to a fire in the history of skyscapers. Throw 'em out there guys, please tell us ...

Arguments for and Against Gun Control
Arguments against gun control:. 1) The firearm is THE ONLY piece of personal property guaranteed NOT to be regulated by the government in the USConstitution. 2) Many of the 16000 murders might have been prevented if the victim had been ...

(Somewhat) Effective Biblical arguments against capital punishment
As noted in my post on Ineffective Biblical arguments against capital punishment, I think that capital punishment (CP) is a completely Biblical proposition if properly applied. Having said that, I do have some concerns about how it is ...

Proposition arguments now online
Arguments for and against the 12 initiatives being voted on Nov. 4 can now be seen online at the California Secretary of State's website. The ballot measures range from bonds for high-speed rail, children's hospitals and veteran's ...

Staycations: Arguments For and Against
... a staycation is what most Americans will experience during the summer of 2008…”—Urbandictionary I am not one to argue against heading out of town for a trip away, for... Read: Staycations: Arguments For and Against.

Arguments For and Against Flat Tax
Do they know something we don't? The Standard talks about flat tax, and says:. What’s fair about putting up tax on 78% of Kiwis to give a massive tax cuts to the few most wealthy? What’s fair about taking from the poor to ...

Comment on Ineffective Biblical arguments against capital ...
noted in my post on Ineffective Biblical arguments against capital punishment, capital punishment (CP) is a completely Biblical proposition if properly applied. Most of the [...]

 

 

© 2007 articlesreader.com - All Rights Reserved