ArticlesReader.com Menu
Newest Articles
Most Viewed Articles
ArticlesReader.com RSS
Submit Article
Login
Signup
Search the articles

Articles Main Categories
Advice
Animals
Automobiles
Business
Career
Communications
Computer Programming
Computers
Entertainment
Environment
Family
Fashion
Finance
Food
Health & Medical
Home & Garden
Humor
Internet Business
Internet Marketing
Legal
Leisure & Recreation
Marketing
Other
Politics
Reference & Education
Religion
Self Improvement
Sports
Technology & Science
Travel
Writing
Subscribe
Receive alert message from us when new articles submitted to our site for free.

Enter your name

Enter your email

Syndicate

















Related Products
Home::Politics

Bush vs. Kerry -- Negative Campaigning

Author : Gary R. Hess
As the presidential race hits full throttle, so do the smear campaigns. Negative ads are becoming more important to each parties race as time goes on, it is degrading. This is starting to feel like hatred is the only way either opponent believes they can win. The two major parties have been spitting and clawing at each other since the end of the primaries.

I am a Democrat (actually farther left, but for the sake of voting I am a Democrat), but I still feel saddened by the way the election is being held by Kerry. During the DNC, Democratic National Convention, John Kerry said that he is tired of the negative campaigning and will run a full legitimate campaign for the rest of the way. Then later in the speech started to talk negatively about Bush, how can this be? Not only are his words degrading, but his whole attitude towards the election is. Indeed he does have to defend himself against such things being thrown at him from the opposite side, but he does not need to throw ammunition into the smoking gun.

On the other hand Bush’s boys are definitely not angels. Even before the Democratic Primaries hit main stream Bush was calling out Kerry as the winner and bashing him. Not only that, he as well as Dick Cheney have down graded Kerry’s efforts during Vietnam and his voting record.

Kerry’s medical records show that he was shot as well as had grenade shrapnel lodged inside his leg from a blast during the Vietnam War. How can someone call Kerry unworthy of a Purple Heart when something like this happens? None the less – if he did not get shot or had any medals or shrapnel in his leg, he still served for the United States in time of war. He should not be penalized thirty five years later, especially while his opponent was no where to be found during the same war.

Bush and Cheney have also stated that a Democrat would not be able to defend the country as well as a Republican would. To that, all I have to say is Woodrow Wilson and Franklin D. Roosevelt. Some other Republicans started the Swift Boat ads and continued to smear Kerry’s name even though none of the men claiming he lied on his reports actually served under Kerry during the Vietnam years.

Bush has also stated that Kerry is a “flip flopper” on issues. His reasoning for this is the Vietnam War, the No Child Left Behind Act and the Iraq War. All of these issues are very controversial. John Kerry did go to Vietnam, but he did it in order to serve the country as many other young men and women did. He came back and protested because he saw how wrong the war was… as many other young men and women did.

The No Child Left Behind Act is the same way. Many people supported this before it got settled in, now they oppose it. The bill was set up to look like it would help American schools by giving them money, but in fact none of the needed funds were given to the schools and many of them ended up closing.

As for the Iraq War… very controversial. Bush stated that Iraq was seeking Uranium for nuclear weapons, they weren’t. Bush stated that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, they didn’t. So after the USA finds these statements false, who wouldn’t change their mind besides the heartless?

I wish there was a different candidate who had a legitimate chance to win, but there isn’t. We must now ask ourselves which candidate will fulfill his duties and protect the United States, better the economy and help schools. Will Bush do these things? Perhaps, but most likely? No. Will John Kerry? Yes.

About the Author

Gary is a writer and web designer for http://www.freepgs.com/poetryandmore">Break Up Poems and Articles

garyr_h@yahoo.com

Spam emails More free articles

Related articles


  1. Anarchy: Law, Order, and Authority
  2. Internet in Russia and Ukraine - Part 1. General Information and Statistics
  3. Rule of Thumb For Exporting Technology
  4. Increasing Evaporation in Ocean to Defeat Droughts
  5. The New Goo Review is Coming Right At You
  6. So How Far Have We Come? Here are some of the 2001 Anti Terrorist Projects
  7. Using a Meteor Shower as Decoy for ICBM Attack
  8. Stopping a Nuclear Bomb on a Hydrofoil
  9. Harmonic Beams to Pre-Detonate Shoulder Launched Surface to Air Missiles
  10. Defending Middle Eastern Oil Refineries and Assets
  11. Technology and International Terrorism
  12. Screening Trucks and Containers Coming Into Our Country
  13. Let me throw out a random thought on Homeland Security Leadership Structure
  14. Tracking Over The Road Trucks from Canada
  15. What are the benefits of Nuclear War again; I must have missed that point?
  16. Chinese Military Build Up - Sun Tzu and Chinese War Machine
  17. Cloaking Giant Airships is Possible, Why Stop There?
  18. Canning International Terrorists? Literally
  19. Self Destruct Strategies in UAV Construction
  20. UAV Decoy Stategies, Theories and The Modern Art of War
  21. UAV Materials and Thoughts on New Technologies and Keeping Up With Our Opponents
  22. UAV Targets, Aerial Dog Fights, Interception, Future of War Intelligence
  23. Anglo-Israelism and the Flesh
  24. Israel Termed A ‘Nuclear Power’ By US Officials
  25. Another Round of EU-Iran Talks Starts April 10 - Will Iran Be Referred To The UN Security Council?
More related feeds
The Fruits Of Negative Campaigning
This is a huge problem with the McCain campaign's negative turn. No swing voter took offense if a Bush surrogate called Kerry a limp-wristed, French-looking fraud. But I think they wince when they hear someone accusing Obama of ...

The Republican Nemesis
Whenever Bush’s hand-picked crowd applauded his ridicule of Kerry, it created an image of The Democrats in the minds of swing voters that was never effectively answered by the Kerry Campaign (or by the Gore Campaign or by the Dukakis ...

Massive Spending on Negative Ads by both Major Parties
The organization reports that so far in this campaign, 73% of McCain's ads have been negative and 61% of Obama's ads have been negative. As a comparison, in 2004 61% of Bush's and 34% of Kerry's ads were negative.

This time last cycle
The resemblance of the McSame campaign to the Bush campaign should remind us how mavericky John McCain is NOT. The confidence over Kerry's debate performance versus an angry Bush should give us pause. Especially since various counties ...

McCain’s Ads Nearly 100% Negative
In all of 2004, 64 percent of the Bush campaign’s ads were negative, while to date, 73 percent of McCain’s ads have been negative. Similarly, 34 percent of all Kerry ads were negative while 61 percent of Obama’s have been. ...

Beware The Consequences Of A Negative Campaign
Republicans used negative campaigning successfully against Michael Dukakis and John Kerry, it’s true. But 1988 and 2004 were both years of economic expansion, pro-incumbent years. 2008 is like 1992, only worse. ...

US Election: Hope for Barack Obama in the south as Republican ...
Mr McCain's negative campaigning, while tough and arguably distorting, is no worse than what was thrown at Michael Dukakis in 1988 or John Kerry in 2004. "If Barack were not African-American, they'd be doing this," said Harold Ford, ...

US Presidential Campaign Tone Becomes Increasingly Negative
So go get them," said the voter. Democrats have urged Obama to fight back against the attacks, mindful of the negative attacks ads that helped undermine the 2004 Democratic nominee for president, Senator John Kerry. ...

ATWATER ACOLYTES
It cost McCain that election, and set Bush on the path to capture the nomination. Karl Rove also masterminded the dirty campaign against John Kerry, the worst being the privately financed swift-boaters avalanche of TV ads. ...

After McCain released his "Obama wants to teach kindergarteners ...
Negative campaigning works, attack ads attract attention, and slung mud often sticks. But, there are ebbs and flows in the degree to which the American people accept character assassination. And this flow of wingnut fearmongering needs ...

 


 

© 2007 articlesreader.com - All Rights Reserved