|
Home::Politics
Bully for prohibitionists
Author : Kurt St. Angelo
Imagine that I wanted you to quit gambling, or to stop smoking something, or to save more for your retirement. I have my reasons, okay? The world would be a much better place if it did things my way.
I confront you on the street while you’re smoking. I threaten you with a club until you put out your cigarette and give me the rest of them, which I crumble into a trashcan. As I leave, you call the police on your cell phone to report me for armed robbery.
The next day, a few of my well intentioned homeys and I confront you again about your bad habit. After we take your new pack “for your own good,“ you report our felonious gang activity.
Over the next several days, my gang gets bigger and bigger until it acts like a mob. You call the police, but get no action because most of them are sympathetic to my group.
During the next week, my mob grows as big as a political majority, and when you call the police department, I answer the telephone. I tell you that smoking anything is now prohibited, and that you’ll go to jail unless you quit.
You can barely hear yourself over the chants of the self-righteous majority in the background. You ask, but how can this be? Last week the police protected my rights to smoke and be free from violent moralists. Today you’re policing me on their behalf. Isn’t it a crime to threaten violence to change my nonviolent behavior or to forcefully take my property? How did you convert my smoking to a crime and elevate your crimes to my solution?
Because I can, I answer. I’m the political majority. I have enough voters, enforcers, experts, and judges to say that wrong is right. My use of violence to fight your smoking is moral because enough people say it is. If only enough sinners threw stones, stone throwing would also be right.
Wrong.
On a recent television show, Dr. Phil explained group dynamics to a twelve-year-old girl who was being harassed by some neighborhood girls. He said that bullies are cowards who get their strength only in numbers. He said that some people get the courage to do things in groups that they would never do alone.
Likewise, in the privacy of voting booths, some people ask government to do things that they would never – on moral or criminal grounds – do themselves. As well, most politicians call for government to do things that it has no authority to do. For example, if we as individuals have no right to use force to make others quit smoking, then we cannot delegate this lack of authority to our agents in government. The sum total of zero authority is zero.
If government derives its just powers from the governed, then there is no place in a just society for the prohibition of individual vice, except in public areas that our governments constitutionally may regulate. (There is some dispute whether a city such as Bloomington, Indiana may regulate smoking in commercial areas.)
Outside these prescribed areas, there is no moral, practical or constitutional authority for citizens to use government force against others’ honest nonviolent behavior, such as smoking. Bullying is not the solution to vice. We cannot coerce virtue into others when coercion is not virtuous. The best approach is to treat all vice as we do alcohol and tobacco cigarettes.
Unlike the Republican Party that he inspired, Abraham Lincoln understood that the prohibition of vice is rule by the brute force of bullies with no moral authority. He said: “Prohibition will work great injury to the cause of temperance. It is a species of intemperance within itself, for it goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a man's appetite by legislation, and makes a crime out of things that are not crimes. A Prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our government was founded."
Dr. Phil said the best way to enfeeble bullies is to not stand with them.
About the Author
Kurt is a hopeful screenwriter. He is a graduate of Pomona College in Claremont, Californina and of Indiana University School of Law - Indianapolis. Spam emails More free articles Related articles
|
More related feeds |
District attorneys lie about marijuana decriminalization initiative
As demonstrably false as these claims are, they are being made by a prominent and respected organization with a bully pulpit, so the campaign will need substantial resources to counter the lies. It's not hard to understand why the ...Illinois gun prohibitionists' next target: standard capacity magazines
contemptible attempt to bully Chicago area representatives who voted against the citizen disarmament party line on HB 758 (virtual ban of private handgun sales). At that time, I speculated that their motive (apart from the joy they ... illinois gun prohibitionists\' next target: standard capacity ...
anyway, friday i talked about the brady campaign\'s (what has happened to their website, anyway--can\'t they afford the web hosting fees) contemptible attempt to bully chicago area representatives who voted against the citizen ... bully for prohibitionists
imagine that i wanted you to quit gambling, or to stop smoking something, or to save more for your retirement. i have my reasons, okay? the world woul. dr. ron paul and lord william rees-mogg vs. the democratic ...
when it comes to natural rights law’s view of the injustice of the pot laws, dr. ron paul has been truly the “hammer of the malefactor”, using the bully pulpit of his congressional office to hammer away at the fascists who so badly ... the gadfly - part two: hl mencken
he saw america not as a shining beacon of perfection but as a deeply flawed nation whose insecurities and inferiority complex caused her to be more schoolyard bully than savior of mankind. he saw america, not as a mature world leader, ... Kings Cross Times: The costs of prohibition: Police break ...
The costs of prohibition: Police break solicitor's rib. More fallout from police bullies with sniffer dogs: A Marrickville solicitor offered legal assistance to a person in a Newtown pub who was indicated by a sniffer dog – a perfectly ... Free Alaska: A Viable Libertarian Presidential Candidate for 2008
Prohibitionists still think so, because they don't belive in individual freedom, or the freedom to make bad choices. But the freedom to choose can't allow the freedom of new thought, if "bad choices" are outlawed. Why? ... Editorial: Why Do People the Government Says Don't Exist Keep ...
(the government prohibitionists) don't come across as the monsters they in fact are. Prohibitionists, particularly those within government, have demonstrated time and time again they are bullies, cowards, thieves and bald faced liars. ... small dead animals: Marc Emery And The Nazi-Jew
The reason it hasn't been done to date, is that the US bully threatens trade sanctions and treaty suspensions. Pot prohibitionists have NEVER made a case for prohibition. That's why they smear people like Emery, to misdirect and hide ...
|
|
|
