|
|
|
Home::Legal
The Cloning Debate
Author : Peter Kennedy
Cloning is the process of creating an exact copy of the original, and recently, “cloning” refers to the replication of living humans and animals. Somatic cell nuclear transfer, as the process is called, involves removing the nucleus from an egg cell and replacing it with the nucleus from a cell of the organism to be cloned. In the past few years, advances have been made in both human and animal cloning. Scottish scientists famously cloned a sheep, and British scientists reportedly cloned a human embryo that survived for five days. Cloning is an extremely controversial subject that forces society to examine the proper limits of man’s control over life.
In 1997, Scottish scientists famously produced a female sheep, “Dolly,” using the process of reproductive cloning. Since that time, other scientists have cloned other species, including cows and rabbits. Most recently, scientists are attempting to reproduce humans through cloning. President Bush and the Republican party are strongly in opposition to human cloning. Conservatively tend to believe that life is a creation, “not a commodity,” and that human cloning would have a disastrous impact on the American moral fabric. In 2002, Congress introduced a bill that would ban human cloning in all forms, imposing a prison sentence and multi-million dollar fine on anyone who attempted human cloning. (The Ban on Human Cloning Act has yet to be passed.)
There are practical considerations to the cloning debate, as well. Most medical experts believe that reproductive human cloning would not produce a health newborn. Indeed, many scientists predict that cloning would produce harmful abnormalities in a baby’s genes. Many scientists and medical practitioners welcome the advance of cloning for individual human cells. This process, called therapeutic cloning, adopts the concept of cloning on a micro scale, to help regenerate broken or diseased body parts. Some politicians, such as Republican Senator Arlen Spector of Pennsylvania, support the idea of therapeutic cloning.
Critics of therapeutic cloning argue that the process should be prohibited, no matter how beneficial the practical applications may turn out to be. The most vocal critics of therapeutic cloning, mainly from religious communities, argue that the destruction of human life, even on cellular level, is a moral offense. These cells form the beginning of human life, and humans do not have the right to destroy life in order to create life. The creation of life, they argue, should be left to God.
The cloning debate lends itself to larger questions, including: Is it immoral to recreate life artificially? Does human life really begin at the cellular level? Should the government interfere with scientific advances that could benefit millions of people?
About the author:
OpineTree is a blog website that encourages debate on today’s most controversial political topics, including abortion, affirmative action, http://www.opinetree.com/cloning.html">cloning, the death penalty, euthanasia, gay marriage, gun control, health care, social security, stem cells, as well as other http://www.opinetree.com”>debate topics. Visit http://www.opinetree.com/cloning.htmlto join the http://www.opinetree.com/cloning.html">cloning debate.
Spam emails More free articles Related articles
|
More related feeds |
Vote Against Embryonic Cloning Seen as Sign of Shifting Debate
In what could signal a further shift in the global stem cell debate, lawmakers in an Australia state have rejected legislation allow the cloning of human embryos for research purposes. Here's my earlier post on that. ...Non-reproductive Cloning
And I, for one, am grateful that both scientists and politicians are willing to recognise there is a serious debate to be had on these matters of conscience, and more is at stake than just a set of irrational prejudices. Australia: Vote Against Embryonic Cloning Seen as Sign of Shifting ...
(CNSNews.com) - In what could signal a further shift in the global stem cell debate, lawmakers in an Australia state have rejected legislation allow the cloning of human embryos for research purposes. ... The Human Cloning Debate: Nail-biting science fiction action and ...
This secret experiment will shock you—is it science fiction or real? How Goes the Fight Against Cloning in Nebraska?
Brad Ashford have been working with both sides of the cloning debate to forge a compromise bill that both sides can accept. That bill, LB 606, was advanced by the Judiciary Committee today and will likely see floor debate in the next ... Annotated Bibliography
"Rebirth of Cloning Debate." Mr. Science. 1 Apr. 2008 . This is a blog about someone's general opinion about cloning. It not only talks about their feelings, ... Debate rages in Minnesota House as stem-cell funding passes
PAUL -- In a heartless act of disregard for the earliest stages of human life, the Minnesota House of Representatives today voted 71-62 in favor of human cloning and embryo-killing experiments. The vote approved the deadly Kahn Cloning ... Human cloning debate stirs emotions locally
While some point to the potential medical and therapeutic promise of cloning, others ask at what cost. Human clones: New UN analysis lays out world's choices
�These are not issues which can be lightly dismissed; however, it is clear that any debate on human dignity needs to separate the various elements of the debate in order to consider whether opposition to cloning stems from concern for ... Class Room Cloning Debate
Or CRCD as I like to call it was the first debate I have ever done, I never tried the debate team at HS or anything. It was fun to be on an assigned side of a debate even though there are defiantly parts of cloning I support and am very ...
|
|
|
|
