ArticlesReader.com Menu

Newest Articles
Most Viewed Articles
ArticlesReader.com RSS
Submit Article
Login
Signup

Search the articles

Articles Main Categories

Advice
Animals
Automobiles
Business
Career
Communications
Computer Programming
Computers
Entertainment
Environment
Family
Fashion
Finance
Food
Health & Medical
Home & Garden
Humor
Internet Business
Internet Marketing
Legal
Leisure & Recreation
Marketing
Other
Politics
Reference & Education
Religion
Self Improvement
Sports
Technology & Science
Travel
Writing

Subscribe

Receive alert message from us when new articles submitted to our site for free.

Syndicate

Related Products

Home::Home & Garden

Construction Fall Protection

Author : Howard Watkins

Personal fall protection in the construction industry. A brief history.
First we called them sissy belts. Each tool trailer had a couple of safety belts but we used them more often as tools rather than safety devices. Our cowboy attitude discouraged us from ever becoming dependant on them. Any display of fear or hesitation aloft would certainly bring criticism, mistrust, harassment and possibly even termination. After all how could you get anything done?
Prior to the debut of OSHA the cost of construction projects were estimated in terms of dollars and lives. The general rule of thumb was a life for each million dollars. Falls were by far the most common cause of fatal accidents.
During the early seventies the advent of OSHA and the rising cost of litigation caused construction companies to begin changing their attitude about personal fall protection. In the early days of OSHA we were required to wear safety belts but most of us were negligent about properly securing them to avoid falls. Some of us were downright stubborn. A far too familiar sight was a worker lying broken on the ground with the lanyard of his safety belt tied into a knot neatly out of his way. After all how could we get anything done?
While making surprise inspections OSHA began to levy heavy fines on the contractor and employee as well. Agents commonly gathered evidence from offsite positions with the use of telescopic photo lenses. Insurance companies put heavy pressure on their client construction companies. By the end of the seventies most of us were accustomed to using safety belts and were encouraged to use them properly.
The eighties brought about the concept of 100 % tie off. A worker was than required to have two lanyards attached to his safety belt. If used properly the worker would be secured by at least one lanyard 100% of the time. No longer could he walk a beam or even move around freely. Moving from one place to another turned into a monotonous chore of fastening and unfastening the safety lanyards. How could we ever get anything done?
By the nineties the risk management bean counters began to take a closer look at injuries caused by safety belts. The safety belt could most certainly save a life but at the same time could cause serious back injuries. While safety experts instructed us to wear the lanyard in the back to avoid back injury the state of the art belt had �D� rings on each side slightly in front. This design made the belt handy to sit in like a work belt though in most cases it was not approved for that purpose.
The next evolution in personal fall protection was the full body safety harness with a shock resistant lanyard attachment. By the end of the nineties the full body safety harness was in use almost universally around the construction industry. Today if a worker is injured from a fall it can almost certainly be proven that he violated a safety rule.
The harness is a most restrictive and uncomfortable device. About 12 to 15 lbs of weight is added to the already heavy load of equipment and tools. It effectively covers all the pockets. It does not easily fit over or under cold weather gear. In a tight spot it snags on every thing like Velcro. It does not easily accommodate the wearing of a tool belt or a bolt bag. Walking in it creates the look of a duck waddle. To this date no one has ever invented a safe lanyard clasp that can be easily manipulated with one gloved hand.
Uncomfortable and restrictive though it may be we are still getting things done. Only now we are getting things done much safer. Without criticism we can now protect ourselves for a long career and our corporate benefactors are reaping a better bottom line.
Howard Watkins

About the Author

Howard Watkins is a retired Master Electrician and presently the Webmaster and editor of http://brassmein.com A construction industry information Website.

Spam emails More free articles

More related feeds

OSHA Proposes $55600 in Fines Following Fall at Pembroke, Mass ...
OSHA’s inspection found employees at the job site performing steel erection work at heights of 20 feet without effective fall protection. OSHA’s steel erection standard requires that an effective form of fall protection, such as safety ...

Lifesaving Tools at Construction Yards of Skyscrapers
Safety at construction sites of skyscrapers must be the most important issue for all construction companies. It is not only a legal but also a moral responsibility that the owner holds. Therefore the fall protection equipment needs to ...

THE UNITED AUTO WORKERS “RACE TO THE BOTTOM” - giving up the ...
On Wednesday, the UAW announced it would reopen its contracts with the Big Three and accept the elimination of the Jobs Bank—which provided income protection for laid-off workers—and allow the auto companies to delay or reduce billions ...

bedrooms and afci protection - InspectionNews - Home Inspection
OK, in new homes, IF you have access to the design firm's construction documents you can say what the intended function of the room is. Without those docs, it's open naming season. Anything goes. Why are the code authoring agencies ...

Pilgrim’s Pride Corp files Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection ...
Quoting the company's difficulties in tough economic time, the challenges of high feed prices, unbalanced chicken inventory, weak market pricing and falling demand, Pilgrim's Pride said it filed for bankruptcy protection after ...

Charlottetown, The Guardian: Local News | Wellington man dies from ...
The construction company in that instance, Prebilt Structures Ltd., has since been fined $50000 after pleading guilty to charges of violating the fall protection regulations of the Occupational Health and Safety Act. ...

Safety in Concrete Construction
The simple use of personal protection equipment (PPEs–hard hats, gloves, boots, eye protection, fall protection, respirators, and so forth.) can save workers from the short-term and long-term effects of construction site conditions. ...

Fall-Protection System: Dual Tie-Offs
The Miller Twin Turbo Fall Protection System features two 6-ft TurboLite Personal Fall Limiters to ensure that the wearer is always tied off, even when transferring a hook. The mounting system allows the fall limiters to swivel in ...

OSHA Violations in 2008 Almost the Same as Those in 2007
In the Construction Industry, Fall Protection for Residential Construction still ranks number 1 with 2280 violations. Such categories as Duty to Have Fall Protection, Head Protection and Aerial Lifts seem to have reserved the 2nd, ...

GotSafety Blog | Horror industrial blast kills Territory worker ...
Safety Vendor. Creative Safety Supply · Fall Protection Equipment · MSHA speciality · Step Change · The Safety Blog. Shopping. 2424ShoppingNetwork. Training. Wordpress Courseware. Workplace Safety. Mysafework. Blue Host. Pages ...

Construction Fall Protection

Related articles