ArticlesReader.com Menu
Newest Articles
Most Viewed Articles
ArticlesReader.com RSS
Submit Article
Login
Signup
Search the articles

Articles Main Categories
Advice
Animals
Automobiles
Business
Career
Communications
Computer Programming
Computers
Entertainment
Environment
Family
Fashion
Finance
Food
Health & Medical
Home & Garden
Humor
Internet Business
Internet Marketing
Legal
Leisure & Recreation
Marketing
Other
Politics
Reference & Education
Religion
Self Improvement
Sports
Technology & Science
Travel
Writing
Subscribe
Receive alert message from us when new articles submitted to our site for free.

Enter your name

Enter your email

Syndicate

















Related Products
Home::History

Myths of the American Civil War

Author : Sam Vaknin
The Civil War (1861-5) has spawned numerous myths and falsities.



The Republicans did not intend to abolish slavery - just to "contain" it, i.e., limit it to the 15 states where it had already existed. Most of the Democrats accepted this solution.



This led to a schism in the Democratic party. The "fire eaters" left it and established their own pro-secession political organization. Growing constituencies in the south - such as urban immigrants and mountain farmers - opposed slavery as a form of unfair competition. Less than one quarter of southern families owned slaves in 1861. Slave-based, mainly cotton raising, enterprises, were so profitable that slave prices almost doubled in the 1850s. This rendered slaves - as well as land - out of the reach of everyone but the wealthiest citizens.



Cotton represented three fifths of all United States exports in 1860. Southerners, dependent on industrial imports as they were, supported free trade. Northerners were vehement trade protectionists. The federal government derived most of its income from custom duties. Income tax and corporate profit tax were yet to be invented.



The states seceded one by one, following secession conventions and state-wide votes. The Confederacy (Confederate States of America) was born only later. Not all the constituents of the Confederacy seceded at once. Seven - the "core" - seceded between December 20, 1860 and February 1, 1861. They were: South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas.



Another four - Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Arkansas - joined them only after the attack on Fort Sumter in April 1861. Two - Kentucky and Missouri - seceded but were controlled by the Union's army throughout the war. Maryland and Delaware were slave states but did not secede.



President James Buchanan who preceded Abraham Lincoln, made clear that the federal government would not use force to prevent secession. Secession was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court only in 1869 (in Texas vs. White) - four years after the Civil War ended. New England almost seceded in 1812, during the Anglo-American conflict, in order to protect its trade with Britain.



The constitution of the Confederacy prohibited African slave trade (buying slaves from Africa), though it allowed interstate trade in slaves. The first Confederate capital was in Montgomery, Alabama - not in Richmond, Virginia. The term of office of the Confederate president - Jefferson Davis was the first elected - was six years, not four as was the case in the Union.



Fort Sumter was not the first attack of the Confederacy on the Union. It was preceded by attacks on 11 forts and military installations on Confederate territory.



Lincoln won only 40 percent of the popular vote in 1860. Hence the South's fierce resistance to his abolitionist agenda. In 1864, the Republicans became so unpopular, they had to change their name to the Union Party. Lincoln's vice-president, Johnson, actually was a Democrat and hailed from Tennessee, a seceding state.



He was the only senator from a seceded state to remain in the Senate.



Reconstruction started long before the war ended, in Union-occupied Louisiana, Arkansas, and Tennessee. Slave tax was an important source of state revenue in the South (up to 60 percent in South Carolina). Emancipation led to near bankruptcy.



The Union states of Connecticut, Minnesota, and Wisconsin refused to pass constitutional amendments to confer suffrage on black males. The Union army consigned black labor gangs to work on the plantations of loyal Southerners and forcibly separated the black workers from their families.



Contrary to myth, nearly two thirds of black families were headed by both parents. Slave marriages were legally meaningless in the antebellum South, though. But nearly 90 percent of slave households remained intact till death or forced separation. The average age of childbirth for women was 20.



Segregation was initiated by blacks. The freedmen lobbied hard and long for separate black churches and educational facilities. Nor was lynching confined to blacks. For instance, a white mob lynched, in September 1862, forty four Union supporters in Gainesville, Texas. Similar events took place in Shelton Laurel, North Carolina. The Ku Klux Klan was the paramilitary arm of the Democratic party in the South, though never officially endorsed by it. It was used to "discipline" the workforce in the plantations - but also targeted Republicans.



The Democrats changed their name after the war to the Conservative Party. By 1877 they have regained power in all formerly Confederate states.


Article Source: http://www.articledashboard.com





Sam Vaknin ( samvak.tripod.com ) is the author of Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited and After the Rain - How the West Lost the East. He served as a columnist for Global Politician, Central Europe Review, PopMatters, Bellaonline, and eBookWeb, a United Press International (UPI) Senior Business Correspondent, and the editor of mental health and Central East Europe categories in The Open Directory and Suite101.

Until recently, he served as the Economic Advisor to the Government of Macedonia.

Visit Sam's Web site at samvak.tripod.com





Spam emails More free articles

Related articles


  1. Argentina's Economy in a Nutshell
  2. History of Olmec Civilisation
  3. The First Serial Killer - Ed Gein
  4. Another Look at Mahatma Gandhi
  5. Ferdinand Marcos - President of the Philippines, 1917-1989
  6. Augusto Pinochet, President of Chile, born 1915
  7. The USSR That Could Have been - Lenin's New Economic Policy
  8. The Uganda Scheme
  9. The Teapot Dome Scandal
  10. The Story of the Guillotine
  11. The First September 11
  12. The Family of Jesus Christ
  13. The Constitution of the Weimar Republic
  14. The Building of the Pentagon
  15. The Armenian Genocide
  16. The Abdication Crisis Revisited
  17. More about the Prohibition
  18. Lindbergh, Charles Augustus
  19. Human-made Monsters
  20. Facts and Figures about the Presidents of the USA
  21. Another Look at Indians (Native Americans, Amerindians)
  22. A Moment of Truth about Maxim Gorky
  23. Dr. Walter Freeman's Frontal Lobotomies at Athens (Ohio) State Hospital
  24. Myths of the American Civil War
  25. The Aung San Family in Myanmar
More related feeds
The War That Changed The World
The Great War was Canada’s War of Independence and American Civil War combined into one shattering event. Canadians came together as never before, but at the same time nearly lost the country. Region was pitted against region, ...

Religion and Politics at the Rotary Club
But even after the Civil War, patterns of religious geography were hugely influential in national politics. Here’s one thing that tended to happen: Catholics voted one way (typically Democratic), Protestants another (typically ...

Lincoln: The Man Behind the Myth - Not Finished
On the contrary, the evidence strongly suggests he would have led the so-called Radical Republicans. Highly recommended for any reader with an interest in Lincoln, the Civil War era, or really pretty much any American.

The Myth about the Troop Surge
When the inevitable pull out of American forces does occur what does the American government think is going to happen to the opposition? Is the propped up Iraqi government stable enough to withstand an internal civil war by a large ...

Truth?…and consequences
For example, if one were to ask if the historical accounts of the American Civil War are true, one would mean did such events happen in history as we have recorded. Of course, I do realize that none of us are objective and that we all ...

September 2008 Book Notes
The Lincoln Prize administered by the Civil War Institute at Gettysburg College, is awarded annually since 1991 for the best non-fiction historical work of the year on the American Civil War. The prize is $50000 and a large bronze ...

Review of The Sixties : A Journal of History, Politics and Culture
grappling with that era's complicated legacy, beyond its familiar sights, sounds and nostalgic/traumatic memories : the American Civil Rights Movement, the Beatles, May 68 in France, the Vietnam War, the student massacre of Tlateloco in ...

New and Forthcoming: Assasination Plot, RE Lee and the Collapse of ...
In 2004-2005, he was the first non-American to serve as a member of the Lincoln Prize jury panel, which awards the most important literary prize in the field of Civil War history. His many books include The Origins of the American Civil ...

Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan is a Zionist terrorist fifth column front.
In Pakistan we find the complete history of the American “war on terrorism,” from its Cold War origins nearly thirty years ago to its present incarnation in the illegal American aggression in Pakistan’s Frontier region (FATA, ...

Why is This Book Getting So Much Attention?
One of the online news items that I came across on Williams's new book, Bitterly Divided: The South's Inner Civil War, includes an interesting interview. But first the book jacket description:. The American Confederacy, historian David ...

 


 

2007 articlesreader.com - All Rights Reserved