ArticlesReader.com

 

ArticlesReader.com Menu
Newest Articles
Most Viewed Articles
ArticlesReader.com RSS
Submit Article
Login
Signup
Search the articles

Articles Main Categories
Advice
Animals
Automobiles
Business
Career
Communications
Computer Programming
Computers
Entertainment
Environment
Family
Fashion
Finance
Food
Health & Medical
Home & Garden
Humor
Internet Business
Internet Marketing
Legal
Leisure & Recreation
Marketing
Other
Politics
Reference & Education
Religion
Self Improvement
Sports
Technology & Science
Travel
Writing
Subscribe
Receive alert message from us when new articles submitted to our site for free.

Enter your name

Enter your email

Syndicate

















Related Products
Home::Finance

Has Psychology Stolen Your Investing Objectivity?

Author : Matthew Clement

It has been said that the way to earn the most from your investments is to keep careful track of them. But be very cautious before accepting this advice at face value; it may very well create more problems than you realize.

The more you pay attention to your own investments, the more you become psychologically vested in their performance. There is a proven tendency to keep an investment after a loss to avoid the pain associated with that loss, or to sell an investment after a gain to experience the feeling of a ‘winning choice.’ This is known as the disposition effect. Either action would be an example of using the wrong criteria for an investment decision, and most often, it leads to lower overall performance.

Perhaps you’re saying, “Not a chance! I don’t sell my investments because they’ve done well, I keep them because they’ve done well!” In that case, you have just brought up another psychological pitfall—forming expectations of the future based on events of the recent past. This is one example of a concept known as herding, and it’s potentially hazardous. In the market, there is actually a reverse correlation between the recent past and the near future. In other words, if a segment of the market has done really well in the last three months, it is more likely to under-perform in the following three months, rather than continue its upward trend. This is known as reversion to the mean.

Now you’re saying, “Wait, so holding an investment because of poor performance is irrational, but so is holding an investment because of excellent performance?” The only answer is, “It depends.” Making investment decisions based on short-term past performance is generally plagued with irrational tendencies. However, making such decisions based upon long-term performance, relative to the investment objective being used, is far more appropriate, especially when in conjunction with other criteria, such as your time horizon, risk tolerance, and overall objective.

So what can you do to prevent irrationality?
Seek the help of a professional!

©2005 Matthew S. Clement, All rights reserved.

Matthew S. Clement is a financial planner and investment advisor representative with Financial Network Investment Corporation, member SIPC. He provides holistic wealth management and retirement planning to individuals and businesses. He can be reached in New York at (845) 942-8578, or by email: ClementM@FinancialNetwork.com.

Spam emails More free articles

Related articles


  1. Summer's Interest Rate Mystery
  2. Dirty Money; be careful what you touch
  3. Protect Your Assets and Your Financial Future
  4. Financial Freedom for Doctors
  5. Financial Freedom for Lawyers
  6. Is My Money Safe? On The Soundness Of Our Banks
  7. Annuity Transfer - What Are The Risks
  8. Love, Marriage and Money
  9. How To Reduce Banking Fees
  10. Turning Your Trash Into Cash
  11. Saving Money: Finding What Works for You
  12. Treat Money Well To Attract More
  13. Has Psychology Stolen Your Investing Objectivity?
  14. "Will That Be Cash Or Credit?"
  15. Time Out
  16. Getting Some Perspective On Your Avoidance Habits
  17. 3 Steps to Personal Financial Success - Part III: Save Some Money
  18. Creating A Realistic Business Budget
  19. Don't Buy The Government Grant Guides From The Joker Or The Joke Will Be On You
  20. To Factor or Not to Factor?
  21. How To Balance Your Checkbook Instantly!
  22. Why Are So Many Americans Financially Dumb?
  23. Data Mining
  24. We The People, Must Follow Through
  25. Feespeak
More related feeds
Pension Pulse: A Bubble in Bonds?
When you lose half your 401(k) you care more about the return of your money than return on your money. The lack of animal spirits will influence investing for years to come. The government will have to play risk taker of last resort. ...

Has Psychology Stolen Your Investing Objectivity?
It has been said that in order to earn the maximum benefit from the investment is to closely monitor them. But be very careful before taking this advice at face value, it may well create more problems than you realize. ...

Neuropath « The Pinocchio Theory
The only other thing - and it’s just a quibble, really - has to do with evolutionary psychology. The question I would ask is simply: How would you rank the cognitive status of your discourse versus that of evolutionary psychology? ...

Has Psychology Stolen Your Investing Objectivity?
By Matthew Clement It has been said that the way to earn the most from your investments is to keep careful track of them. But be very cautious before accepting this advice at face value; it may very well create...

Pigreco-San Trader: SCORTE GAS IN CALO
The OIL STOCKS of 2009 ~ PowerShares DB Crude Oil Double Long ETN (Public, NYSE:DXO) - How did Great Grandpa get rich? .... take your pick. $ $ $ $ 1) OIL 2) INVESTING 3) REAL ESTATE ... with DXO you get 2 of the top wealth creat. ...

Liberal secularist Scrooges shamed by generous Christian ...
Then, when they lose much of it because a Bernie Madoff has stolen all that they gave, you might begin to think that leaving the charity to the government is not such a foolish idea after all. The number of charities that Madoff has ...

There Is An Urgent Need To Inflate Our Deflating Economy ...
The ProfitScore IQ is our monthly newsletter in which we discuss the US and global economy and trends we see emerging that can affect your investment success.

Greg Laden's Blog : The natural basis for gender inequality
And for gulls and terns, the big risk with respect to producing offspring is not so much that your neighbor has slept with your mate. Rather, the risk is that your neighbor eats your babies when you are distracted. ...

LearntoSpeakEnglish.com » Blog Archive » The modern concept of ...
The objective of Human Resources is to maximize the return on investment from the organization’s human capital and minimize financial risk. It is the responsibility of human resource managers to conduct these activities in an effective, ...

Gold timers more bullish than they've been in five months ...
So Hulbert has your admiration for getting paid to spew ill advised and uninformed investment strategies? Strategies that some will undoubtedly follow and lose their hard earned money because he is perceived as some kind of expert. ...